|
|
|
2005-01-20 - 12:52 a.m. 1999—James Gomez of the Think Centre publishes ‘Self-Censorship: Singapore’s Shame’. It’s a pretty podium-pounding indictment of how censorship has been internalized and normalized by the citizenry. Chua Lee Hoong, one of the Straits Times’ most prominent poitical columnists, once replied to a question on what she felt about being a former Internal Security Department ‘analyst’ with the unforgettable words: “I’m not ashamed”.
1999—‘sex.violence.blood.gore’, by The Necessary Stage, receives 3 cuts to the script for being ‘racially/religiously inflammatory’. Decision by PELU is delivered one day before the play opens. The play is eventually performed and the censored portions photocopied and distributed to audience members. A copy of the letter from PELU was read out in the middle of the performance in a matter-of-fact tone: unsexy, bloodless, not gory, but with the full understated violence of a frog-boiling, testicle-taming nanny state.
1999—Movie title ‘Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me’ is changed to ‘Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shioked Me’; this decision ultimately overturned in favour of original title. Censors achieved two things: they highlighted Singaporeans to the meaning of ‘shag’, and also stained for good the meaning of the vernacular ‘shiok’.
1998—Francis Seow, political exile, publishes ‘The Media Enthralled—Singapore Revisited.’ On the one hand, it’s easy to dismiss the book as ‘Chip-On-The-Shoulder Literature.’ On the other, this book shows why so many of us instantly laughed when Business Times journalist Catherine Ong, threatened with a defamation suit by tycoon Oei Hong Leong in 2004 said, “I believe in freedom of speech”.
1998—Amendment is made to 1981 Films Act with an introduction of the Political Videos Act, approved overwhelmingly in Parliament. In part, the vague and sweeping legislation defines a party political film as one "made by any person and directed toward any political end in Singapore" or one that contains "partisan or biased references on any political matter." Should you start getting rid of your stash of National Day Parade VHS tapes already?
1998—Hong Kong artist Zunzi Wang’s artwork, a political cartoon featuring caricatures of then-SM Lee and PM Goh, is removed by officials from the Singapore Art Museum and destroyed just prior to the opening of ARX5. The artist is not informed until the opening. Some have defended the museum’s actions as a ‘curatorial failure’, instead of an ‘instance of censorship’. Anyone’s got a thesaurus?
1997—Singapore Broadcasting Authority issues Internet Code of Practice. SBA does not realise that ‘Internet Regulation’ happens to be an oxymoron.
1997—I-S magazine’s license is not renewed by MITA. MITA statement reads: ‘I-S Magazine has flouted [our] guidelines by publishing items which are objectionable, for example, phone lines offering phone sex, ads which are lewd, and ads which promote unacceptable lifestyles such as homosexuality’. A scan through back issues of I-S magazine fails to show up advertisements exhorting the population to explore the pleasures of same-sex sweet-lovin’.
1995—American Academic Dr Christopher Lingle’s article in International Herald Tribune, ‘Smoke over Parts of Asia Obscures Some Profound Concerns,’ incurs government wrath; SM Lee files a civil libel suit. IHT pays S$213,000 in damages plus costs for the civil suit. Lingle is separately ordered by the courts in April to pay S$71,000 in damages, plus costs, to the Senior Minister. Lingle’s crime? Stating that an unnamed country uses a ‘compliant judiciary to bankrupt opposition politicians’. Only opposition politicians? Hmmm.
|